Aside from allowing me to attend school and continue with my independent studies and public dissertation I am not overwhelmingly of the opinion that my college, Tacoma Community College, is fighting the good fight so far as the AIDS attack is concerned.   Instead, we appear to be business as usual insofar as lampooning the public trust by plodding forward with the intentions of the attackers. Seattle Central Community College banned me long ago saying I wouldn’t succeed as a student, forcing me to return to Pittsburgh, Community College of Allegheny County, from which I graduated.   I politely consulted Seattle Central to the effect that while I don’t want to attend school where I am unwelcome, they should review the fact that their grounds is not credible. I may be a trouble magnet, but I am not a troublemaker. In light of the fact that people have very brutally attacked me, unprovoked, since childhood, in recurrent episodes, and targeted my friends and loved ones, I am aware that if TCC is aware of this problem they have reasonable grounds to consider the possibility that having me as a student is an added risk to public safety.  I don’t know what to say except that I am very approachable and have no car, fighting ability or weapons.  I'm just a library clerk by trade. Although I am a persona in that respect to a political action lobby, it is not, really my doing. It’s an issue of targeting.

     This fact is very violently disputed and I believe that Al Souma at Seattle Central disapproved of me very specifically for trying to warn people about this very prospect.  Afterwards, as if on cue, an innocent woman was killed outside the clubhouse program there shortly afterwards and there is every reason to believe it was a warning just as I explained I feared to Mr. Souma and the SCC Union.  He did not say I was banned from school because of issues of safety caused by targeting. He seemed to be saying I had made the whole thing up. While I considered that wishful thinking, that’s better than the truth.

     I work very hard on my classes.  I was excluded from school by deafness most of my life and labored washing dishes for years, even being homeless for two years.  This deafness was done to me purposefully and experimentally.  The experimental nature of what was done is both obvious and denied, which it pains me to say, has caused me to have to work in consuming labors of argument that has left my arms in splints, much to the satisfaction of the control faction conducting the experiment, which is, if you are opposed to deliberately deafening a public school child, obviously criminal.  I don’t think I am radical or anti-authoritarian per se for noting what seems obvious, but the zany reasoning of the perpetrators is very much an ongoing hostage situation, manipulating serious injuries they inflicted to scapegoat their prey, experimenting on their target with sadistic biologicals, promoting Jewish hate criminals, particularly Gail Burstyn and Celine Dion, justifying the AIDS attack under Climate Change theory, promoting cheap and slave labors for Clean Up Time, the usual Obama Terrorism from the Black Confederates who dreamed up this vivisection exampling for HitlerReagan. Words, of course, in the United States, become screams.

      In the Security lab lecture today, our Safety Director Mr. Howard, to whom I will probably address this note, mentioned that engagement with a potentially violent person should be calm and with intent to disarm.   The thinking that seemed to be at work in the murder of Linda Rosen, who I mentioned was an Emergency Room nurse who hollered for “Security” at the sign of a weapon, and was shot by a black woman who said, “She shuddn’a done that.”  This mentality of punishing any attempt to break contact characterizes the theoretical posture of the group who are in control of this deranged and ongoing, lifelong experiment. Any attempt to get away, much less resist, their cult of extremely malicious mistreatment, torture and vivisection is treated to a backlash.  The theoreticians call it a trust mandate and "black psychology", admittedly from white scoundrels, for me, this testifies to my research that shows AIDS was an attack and the purposeful injection threat that got going is an escalation game objective they say can be avoided by compliance.

Although this letter, my recent Failure marks in Math needed to graduate, the hustle in Botany and the demands of Japanese preclude immediate essaying concerning the daily side-notes in my pocket, my background research, information, as well as representation of my personal responses, is online in a labyrinth you can tap into by way of http://storychecksout.org   Aside from allowing me to attend school and continue with my independent studies and public dissertation I am not overwhelmingly of the opinion that my college, Tacoma Community College, is fighting the good fight so far as the AIDS attack is concerned.   Instead, we appear to be business as usual insofar as lampooning the public trust by plodding forward with the intentions of the attackers. Seattle Central Community College banned me long ago saying I wouldn’t succeed as a student, forcing me to return to Pittsburgh, Community College of Allegheny County, from which I graduated.   I politely consulted Seattle Central to the effect that while I don’t want to attend school where I am unwelcome, they should review the fact that their grounds is not credible. I may be trouble magnet, but I am not a troublemaker. In light of the fact that people have very brutally attacked me, unprovoked, since childhood, in recurrent episodes, and targeted my friends and loved ones, I am aware that if TCC is aware of this problem they have reasonable grounds to consider the possibility that having me as a student is an added risk to public safety.  I don’t know what to say except that I am very approachable and have no car, fighting ability or weapons.  I'm just a library clerk by trade. Although I am a persona in that respect to a political action lobby, it is not, really my doing. It’s an issue of targeting.

     This fact is very violently disputed and I believe that Al Souma at Seattle Central disapproved of me very specifically for trying to warn people about this very prospect.  Afterwards, as if on cue, an innocent woman was killed outside the clubhouse program there shortly afterwards and there is every reason to believe it was a warning just as I explained I feared to Mr. Souma and the SCC Union.  He did not say I was banned from school because of issues of safety caused by targeting. He seemed to be saying I had made the whole thing up. While I considered that wishful thinking, that’s better than the truth.

     I work very hard on my classes.  I was excluded from school by deafness most of my life and labored washing dishes for years, even being homeless for two years.  This deafness was done to me purposefully and experimentally.  The experimental nature of what was done is both obvious and denied, which it pains me to say, has caused me to have to work in consuming labors of argument that has left my arms in splints, much to the satisfaction of the control faction conducting the experiment, which is, if you are opposed to deliberately deafening a public school child, obviously criminal.  I don’t think I am radical or anti-authoritarian per se for noting what seems obvious, but the zany reasoning of the perpetrators is very much an ongoing hostage situation.

      In the Security lab lecture today, our Safety Director Mr. Howard, to whom I will probably address this note, mentioned that engagement with a potentially violent person should be calm and with intent to disarm.   The thinking that seemed to be at work in the murder of Linda Rosen, who I mentioned was an Emergency Room nurse who hollered for “Security” at the sign of a weapon, and was shot by a black woman who said, “She shuddn’a done that.”  This mentality of punishing any attempt to break contact characterizes the theoretical posture of the group who are in control of this deranged and ongoing, lifelong experiment. Any attempt to get away, much less resist, their cult of extremely malicious mistreatment, torture and vivisection is treated to a backlash.  The theoreticians call it a trust mandate and "black psychology", admittedly from white scoundrels, for me, this testifies to my research that shows AIDS was an attack and the purposeful injection threat that got going is an escalation game objective they say can be avoided by compliance.
Although this letter, my recent Failure marks in Math needed to graduate, the hustle in Botany and the demands of Japanese preclude immediate essaying concerning the daily side-notes in my pocket, my background research, information, as well as representation of my personal responses, is online in a labyrinth you can tap into by way of http://storychecksout.org Usually, the current to-be-written pieces are the most important to me, but they all check out to a person healthy enough to ascertain the intimidation that propels them, and objective enough not to be subsumed into undue loyalty to the Administration pulling this outrage.