I know something about the psychology of violent criminals and how they are being organized to terrorize into being a new status quo dominated by a form of intellectual. On the street level they operate like 1001 Nights, you are expected to entertain them, and pray you luck out, but ultimately they have thought through all the evasions and recognize when someone is trying to, what they call, talk their way out of it, and making the target pee first before the head shot is part of the thrill. The intellectuals involved lead you to a brokered enlightenment and if you are a team player you can think properly and that’s square, otherwise you are against them.
They aren’t exactly intellectuals giants but they did manage to pull a fast one. They have sold that they are not the ones in need of reform, society is, and by this mission method they have worked well with those who lock up innocent people and so on, using the hate that hate produces for their special effects. It’s very cosmic and called by the name of Alternative Conflict Resolution. It was put together at Carnegie Mellon with groups like South African Secret Service entering the years of power sharing with the ANC. Tres British.
I recall somewhat hazily how not much fun it was to be a child frightened and molested by an armed gang. The rabid of course knew I was just a badly damaged child with no explanation for what happened, and they called me an adult special learner for ongoing voyayas of blame about their post-doctorate dissertation. Logic doesn’t really work, for example giving something like Agent Orange to a white doesn’t logically mean that Black people should cheer the KKK who did it, but logic isn’t important when dealing with Syphilitarians.
I’ve had the more mundane experience at school of liking another culture that didn’t like me and I’m sure I’m not the only person who ever has been excluded. How can you accept such a culture when they excluded you senselessly? Assuming for the sake of argument you’ve done nothing wrong.
In looking at the situation with Justin Chang and Andrew Cho, a disheartening alliance plying the usual storyline about the crime on Mt. Desert Island, not to revisit old wounds, but Wen was with O’Connor the owner of the Kelly School incident van, who in turn was in the organization of Jennifer Rubin that helped put together the Trojan Horse of foreign diversity as an Imperial upload to American sensibilities, there is another world out there, beyond the bullets and crying terror of the puppet master in England.
The relevance of non-significant findings about the world are an adventure, yet the term relevance pulls on the word non-significant, yet the evidence states that routine playfulness may make children more understanding and harmonious about the world.
Pop culture has examples of encouragement to abandon meaning, like the Talking Heads record Stop Making Sense, but the attending image is one of pliancy and being controlled by people who do understand. Does language interfere? The danger of bias entering the theoretical framework choosing methodology is described by Korean Buddhism as an innate condition playing out into this world we are born to, the Li and the Ki. To observe faithfully there may be no obstacles between the observed and the observer that originate in the observing mind. Some past theories like eugenics were obscene examples of the obstacle becoming an impregnable power structure, taunting with their mind-perceiving syphilitics, and foreign English Taliban now. So in other words they had or have momentum and give or gave construction to their falsehood as a way of claiming truth. In other words, tyranny is truth because it prevails, according to their doctrine. To defy them you must die to prove for veracity. That’s normal Hitlerism and now the rule with Trump. This doesn’t really falter for being an intellectual fallacy. You to fight back against the abandonment of meaning which has two faces in that sense: Veracity and The Problem of Power Being Abused.
Lifting obstacles to understanding means clearing the mind but a door that wide open can let in predators of the sort that for example Weimar hoped would change with an opportunity to be recognized for reform. We know how that turned out. The same outfit is now in new clothes deeply wounding this strange Confederacy we still call America. For verification take the book item: “American Money and the Weimar Republic” by Wm. C. McNeil published in 1986 by Columbia. P. 4 reads, “The efforts to find an acceptable level and range of government influence in the National economy had to be faced in all capitalist states and echoes of the debates aired in Germany in the 1920’s (e.g. again) can still be heard in industrial countries in the 1980’s. This arrived more or less with the verminous SO by Penis Gabriel.
Thos. Mann, in 1936, penned too clearly the terms, “Surely we were culpable having believed all those pulings about the brothers in the Sudetenland. We could not credit the prospect of such heaped up knavery and manuvering when we all knew it was never a question of the brothers, but of the Skoda works, Czech oil, Hungarian grain.” So history asks us somehow to revisit the fall of Weimar as an act of self-examination in the House That Bruno Built.
